| 
   AMERICAN
  CINEMA PAPERS 
 1983 
  | 
  
   BERLIN FILM FESTIVAL – 1983 BRIGHT RED
  TOFFEE APPLES   by Harlan Kennedy   At first sight he may appear a trifle
  rough, even vulgar. But you have to remember that he spent more than half a
  century in Berlin, where there lives – as many a detail has made me realize –
  a species of the human race so bold that little can be gained by treating
  them with nicety; on the contrary, you have to grit your teeth and resolve to
  be brutal yourself if you don't want to go under. —Goethe, 1827 It was a dark and
  wintry night when the Titanic came to West Berlin. This was not the
  ghost of the great ocean liner but a giant chunk of live-in sculpture, formed
  of a large slab of shiny gray stone pierced at an angle by a glass room. It
  was craned down from the skies on the FilmFestspiele's
  opening night. Astonished Berliners stood by and dropped
  their bright red toffee apples. The arrival of the Titanic, designed
  by Peter Sturzebecker and Kenji Tsuchiya to
  symbolize the split and encompassed city (a room of light encased in stone)
  also marked half a century since Hitler's ascension to power and was,
  possibly, the most alarming thing Berliners
  had
  seen since the erection of The Wall. Behind this
  architectural beast (soon to be tamed by becoming a festival information and
  news point) lurked the palatial Zoo-Palast Cinema,
  where the early phase of the Main Competition was hitting an average of two
  icebergs per day. Enough to crack the spirit. Concussed passengers wondered
  how the festival ship could possibly survive a movie like West Germany's This
  Rigorous Life by Vadím Glowna, a story of displaced
  Germans in Texas oppressed by colliding accents (Spanish Angela Molina and Polish Jerzy
  Radzilowicz, Wajda's Man
  of Iron, play the lead "Teutons") and
  Fifties-style color photography. Or Daniel Schmid's
  high-camp Hecate from Switzerland,
  where Lauren Hutton and Bernard Giraudeau cavort through the North African casbahs. Here
  Miss H. surely becomes the first leading lady of cinema to be ravished on a
  balcony in full evening dress – and in very challenging ¾ time, to
  the accompaniment of an oompah waltz. The festival rallied,
  and steamed on toward a fair final week. Balmy zephyrs arrived with four
  feisty movies by Margarethe Von Trotta, Eric Rohmer, Alain
  Tanner,
  and Alain Robbe-Grillet. Von Trotta's was best. Heller Wahn (Labor of Love) is a smoldering tale
  of sibling loyalties like her previous film, The German Sisters. This
  time, though, the two heroines, mentally disturbed Ruth (Angela Winkler) and
  ice-cool Olga (Hanna Schygulla), aren't
  sisters, they're the wives of mutual friends. When they strike up an
  intimate, symbiotic friendship, despite the jealous cries of their males, Von Trotta seems to be bugling a reveille for a new
  Germany, reknit by feminist strength and wisdom and
  the banishment of patriarchy. Labor of Love is also kookily
  electrifying on its own level of character-chemistry. Winkler, whose
  brother's suicide has tipped her into mourning madness, is a
  lightning-struck, black-garbed Antigone; her
  goldfish mouth is ever agape to communicate the incommunicable. Schygulla is
  a tender, musk-cheeked nymph in primrose yellow, with a streak of pure
  viciousness. The sweet and savage sides of a Platonic romance are strongly
  folded together, and the movie climaxes with one of the most memorable
  gunshots since Spellbound. How the mighty are
  time-warped! Robbe-Grillet is still fixated on Marienbadesque surrealism. Tall men in
  tuxedos; sex and shadow-play in Palladian mansions; glances exchanged like
  moves in a game of Nim. There is nothing more
  formalist than some forms of irrationality. And yet La Belle Captive, photographed
  by visionary French veteran Henri Alekan, was
  the best-looking film in Berlin. Its plot – hero seeks beautiful
  girl, casually met the day before at a disco, who turns out to have been dead
  for six years – is the trigger to a Cocteau-like game of mystic erotic
  consequences, using Magritte's paintings as iconic text and a dazzling
  knock-on of non-sequitur as rhythmic base. In The White City takes Swiss director Alain Tanner
  to Portugal, where he is hit by a dose of minimalism even stronger than the
  one that got Wim Wenders
  in
  The State of Things. Ship's engineer Bruno
  Ganz stops
  off at Lisbon to have a mid-life crisis. This consists of large hours of
  walking the streets or gazing out of his hotel window. Meantime, he has an
  affair with the young hotel maid, writes letters and sends an 8-mm film diary
  to his wife in Germany, and is mugged and non-fatally stabbed by street
  hoodlums. Sounds like my vacation. Tanner says he made
  the film up as he went along. But no rude remarks, please, because this is
  one movie where spontaneous evolution does work – oddly, crankily, and
  eventually. A clock that runs backward, white sheets dancing in the wind,
  and Ganz's dazzlingly extemporized performance,
  built on doodles and tiny tics of behavior, tell the story of a man trying to
  create a clean-slate freedom by a constant, time-defying rhythm of wiping
  away the past and starting again. In Pauline a la Plage Eric Rohmer says,
  "Take your partners, please" for another of the French helmer's sprung-rhythm sexual comedies. This one is set
  in beach-resort Normandy among a permutating
  sextet of three men, three women. There's something unnerving about Rohmer's
  productivity-rate. Like rabbits from a bottomless top hat, these toujours charmants tales keep being plucked. But this one is as
  wise and funny as the best, and no moviemaker in the world has Rohmer's knack
  for finding the tiny air-gap, like a man drowning in an icy river between
  farce and tragedy, and breathing deeply, luxuriously in. ● A brace of movies in
  the Competition deserve to be hymned for their visual qualities. Xavier Schwarzenberger, the Austrian
  cinematographer of several Fassbinder films, directed his
  first feature, The Still Ocean, and it joined Robbe-Grillet's
  film and Erden Kiral's A Season In Hakkari from Turkey as one of the three
  handsomest movies on show. Hanno Pôschl plays a young country
  doctor coping with personal guilt (for past negligence that killed a patient)
  and a rural rabies epidemic. Meanwhile a pastoral storm of fabulous lighting
  effects – lucent mists and foliate shadows and swags of chiaroscuro
  – turns the film into an Eighties realm of true German Expressionism. The Turkish film is
  differently eye-catching. Blocks of daylight-scorched Kurdish primitivism
  build the tale of an itinerant teacher spending winter in a snow-clad
  mountain village. Slow story but hewn and hieratic images. Kiral won the Silver Bear Special Jury Prize for the
  film. ● The Golden Bear was
  again surgically bisected. Mario Camus's underwhelming La Colmena (The Beehive), a kind of Iceman
  Cometh set in post-Civil War Spain, shared the top prize with Edward
  Bennett's Ascendancy from Britain.
  Bennett casts Julie Covington (the original Evita
  who
  played Sister Sarah in the National Theatre revival of Guys and Dolls) as
  a rich girl in 1920 Belfast; she wears the trauma of her brother's death in
  World War I in a paralyzed right arm and is slowly awakening to the new war
  on her very own doorstep, between the British and the Irish. (1920 was the
  year in which British rule came to Northern Ireland.) The movie is decent
  and austerely serious, and Covington wears her black weeds attractively in a
  role that's really a one-woman funeral procession. But Bennett's direction
  doesn't make the pulse race, and he tends to simplify the Irish problem into
  a mere Emerald Isle extension of that old British warhorse, class
  conflict. ● All in all, the 1983
  official movies were some compensation for the fact that year after year fest-chief Moritz de Hadeln
  (and, before him, Wolf Donner and Alfred Bauer) has
  been caned red and raw for the poor quality of the Main Competition. This
  year, as if blessed by Herr Micawber, something kept
  turning up. And even on the days when something didn't, there were always
  the eventful Berlin sideshows – The Young Film-Makers Forum, The New
  German Cinema section, The Retrospective, The Information-Show – to
  which one dashed off for a hot and hasty bite. These filmgoing
  equivalents of the Imbiss kiosks on the
  sidewalks yielded up hot dogs and currywurst to
  gelid or expiring passers-by. Ulrich and
  Erika Gregor run the Forum with firmness, vigor, and a
  brave attempt at air-conditioning, in a large, tomb-like air-raid shelter
  called the Delphi Filmpalast. This
  "alternative" event boasts huge and faithful audiences of the bedenimed young. If the kids can't find seats at a packed
  screening, they don't stand demurely against the wall as in the Zoo-Palast; they encamp on the tobacco-ashed
  floors or hang from the bomb-damaged caryatids on the ceiling. Many of the Forum
  movies are either hard-line political agitprops
  or
  hard-core structuralist conundrums. The latter
  come with titles like (I'm improvising) Windows No. 17A or Replay
  Gestalt with Negative-exposed Taxis. They are good to sample as aesthetic
  flavor-clearers – cheese or sherbet – between courses. Some are even tangy
  and revelatory in their own right. Michael Snow's So Is This_______ plasters white-lettered words of
  varying sizes on a black screen and, like Godard
  in
  his heyday, shows the astonishing kinetic, sensual impact of words and
  letters. But even the Forum
  stands or falls by its feature films, and this year it tottered. Best
  discovery was Tankred Dorst's
  Eisenhans. This plugs into the German
  Wozzeck tradition of boor-as-hero,
  with Gerhard Olschewski playing a lumbering
  beer-truck driver of low I.Q. whose devotion to his semi-autistic daughter (Susanne Lothar) is more than paternal. He remains undismayed even as Buchner-like tragedy falls out of the heavens,
  threatening to bash him on the cranium. What galvanizes this
  monochrome movie of love's lumbers loosed is Dorst's
  use of an all-through symbolism of rift and rupture. The East-West German
  border setting acts as tuning fork to all the barbed emotional
  "frontiers" of the story – the girl's adolescence, the father's
  brute dithering before the no-go area of sex – and there are leitmotiven throughout that give imagistic density to the film.
  Cracking, grass-pierced tiles in a tavern kitchen are rhymed with quaked and
  fissured cobbles in a street. Turkeys and chickens squawk and clamor as
  farmyard ids. Best of all, Dorst unironically bestows angelic
  qualities on the girl (visual puns on haloes and angel's wings) but ends by
  making her passivity the strongest force of evil in the movie. "Slumberer, awake," the movie seems to say-perhaps as
  much to Germany as to its heroine. ● Those who didn't want
  to wake could hibernate in the Retrospective. For an event that has previously
  fielded lustrous tributes to Lillian Harvey, Marlene
  Dietrich, 3-D
  und su weiter, this
  year's Retro was a disappointing rag-bag. "Exile: Six
  Actors from Germany" spoke the title, and the intent was no doubt to mark
  the 50th anniversary of Hitler's election-to-power by outlining six careers
  that might have been totally different had Herr
  H.
  not goose-stepped into history. Whether they would have been any more
  distinguished is open to question. The medium-to-low-magnitude
  careers of Francis Lederer, Curt Bois, Dolly
  Haas, Hertha Thiele, Wolfgang Ziher
  (aka Paul Andor),
  and
  Elisabeth Bergner duly unspooled. But outside Deutschland, Bergner was the only "star" of the sextet. And
  even her elfin face, cracked-honey voice, and poor-little-rich-vamp persona
  wear thin when she's called on by director-husband Paul Czinner
  to carry movie after movie set in the same key of S for Schmaltz. Stolen
  Life is a fair 1939 predecessor of the Bette
  Davis classic, but Dreaming Lips is a gooey-eyed
  embarrassment entwining Bergner with "international violinist"
  Raymond Massey. Today's Dream Factory,
  English-speaking division, came to Berlin with Tootsie and That
  Championship Season. The first was a special treat opening the festival and
  wowing Berliners with Dustin Hoffman's beaky transsexual
  allure. The second won Best Actor Silver Bear for Bruce Dern. Also
  on display, honoring Joseph L. Mankiewicz's
  presence on the festival jury, was a special screening of Alles Uber Eva – missed by me,
  alas, which means I'll never be able to honorably emblazon my T-shirt with
  the German slang version of "Fasten your seat belts, it's going to be a
  bumpy night." ● In Berlin's market and
  Information Show – ever-expanding catch-all programs where the
  sublime rubs sprocket-holes with the certifiable – large slices from
  the underside of American cinema were served up in Berlin, hot and steaming.
  Liquid Sky and Vortex attracted massive audiences which
  equally massively dwindled as the movies progressed. The law of diminishing
  Punk returns – how do you keep your viewers interested when you shoot
  all your taboo-shattering bolts in the first reels? – sent many away
  with a new respect for minimalist Tanners and slow-as-she-goes Turkish pics. Three of the best
  fringe-of-festival oddities were no-narrative meditations, using cinema's
  sleight-of-hand to warp us into different worlds, where time stops or speeds
  or slows, and traditional notions of "structure" are dissolved. Echtzeit (Realtime),
  by
  Helmuth Costard and Jurgen Ebert,
  purports to have a thread of story, but on first viewing few could be
  expected to seize it, or even find it. The film is a danse macabre of trick photography
  set in a mysterious space station, where human beings have been reduced to ghostly
  "programs" of their past selves and vision is atomized into lucent
  beads and dots like a moving mosaic. It's a pointillist Wonderland, where the
  mansions are the human mind and the medium is the message. Sans Soleil brings
  back to us France's Chris Marker, once a
  nouvelle vague name to juggle with. This globe-hopping documentary
  is a kind of Levi-Strauss-as-Supertourist: rhyming
  different townscapes and cultures (Japan, Africa, France) in a visual
  collage, while also pinpointing and celebrating their inalienable
  differences. The commentary is polymorphous-pretentious and springs from the
  letters of Sandor Krasna:
  "He
  said he had been round the world three times and that now only banality
  interested him." But the images, freewheeling from emus to umbrellas
  to computers, have a crazy-quilt poetry worthy of Robbe-Grillet. Erik de Kuyper's Casta Diva, from the Netherlands,
  is an aria to the human body, male. In consecutive, unhurried, fixed-camera sequences,
  a man washes himself at a sink; another man fixes a strip-light in a
  bathroom; another cuts his hair; another repairs a car; another cleans a
  large mirror. The soundtrack is now mute, now quietly talkative, now
  exploding outward with an operatic aria or an Italian pop song. It's
  free-association serendipity, locomotion, and gesture as a ballet without
  rules. For 107 minutes it's oddly hypnotic. ● On the last two days
  of the festival, two contrasting and much talked-about political movies
  juggernauted into West Berlin: Emile de Antonio's In The
  King of Prussia and Andrzej Wajda's Danton. De Antonio shot his
  dramatized mock-up of the 1981 Ploughshares 8 trial – starring the
  defendants as themselves and based on a digest of the actual court transcript
  – in a tiny two days squeezed between the group's trial and imprisonment.
  The eight religious anti-nuke crusaders who stormed the General Electric
  building in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, taking hammers to nuclear-missile
  nose-cones, here pop up in wobbliest video to argue their pacifist defences before Judge Martin Sheen. Given de Antonio's
  Marxist sympathies, you'd think it would be an open-and-shut case. And it
  is. The General Electric spokesmen are played (by actors) for maximum
  hot-under-the-white-collar pomposity, and Sheen as the Judge is so busily
  biased and near-dementedly short-fused that it's impossible to see how a
  mistrial wasn't called after half an hour. One suspects, in short, that de
  Antonio's "digest," even if it contains nothing but the truth, is
  so far short of the whole truth as to shade into an area all its own of
  fiction-by-imbalance. ▓ Do "Zoo-Palast" wtargnął Danton Andrzeja
  Wajdy i zademonstrował widzom berlińskiego festiwalu idealne połączenie sztuki filmowej i polityki. Jak
  na film, który był włóczony po ostrych krytycznych
  kamieniach przez dwa tak różne
  konie jak Francuska Partia Komunistyczna i branżowa hollywoodzka
  "Variety", jego zalety
  okazały się prawdziwą niespodzianką.
  Film jest arcydziełem dramatycznego
  kina historycznego i każdy, kto ma oczy do patrzenia, powinien zadać sobie trud, by je szeroko otworzyć.
  (...) "Jesteśmy ostatnią
  szansą wolności"
  mówi Danton. Film Wajdy przekonuje nas, jak strasznie
  krucha jest wolność.
  Kto wątpi, niech podejdzie pod mur berliński ▓ But the next night Andrzej Wajda's Danton bounded
  into the Zoo-Palast and demonstrated the perfect
  fusion of film-making and politics. For a movie that has been dragged over
  rude critical cobblestones of late, by such diverse horses as the French Communist
  Party and Variety, its qualities were quite a surprise. The movie is
  a masterpiece of historical-drama cinema, and those that have eyes to see
  should take the trouble to open them. The Communists no
  doubt passed up Danton's rich complexity of theme
  and image because it didn't spew out a fortune-cookie message at the end and
  because Wajda, since Man of Iron, isn't
  all that popular with Poland's current government. Variety disliked
  the movie, more bewilderingly, because it was "stiff" and
  "literary." Did they stumble into the wrong cinema and see Gandhi
  by mistake? Wajda and
  screenwriter Jean-Claude Carriere (Buñuel's ex-collaborator) don't skim the surface,
  Attenborough-style, with a series of limpid Sunday School tableaux clinched
  by takeaway maxims. They scoop straight to the bottom of the pan to find the
  richest, darkest gravy, where political ideas and human passions blend. In Danton, as
  in all Wajda's best work, the people are their
  ideas and passions. Gerard Depardieu's Danton is
  a force of Nature, hands waving and lank locks streaming down a demon-worked
  face as he argues himself literally hoarse in the people's tribunal where he
  was arraigned in 1793 as a counter-revolutionary. Woijech
  Posniak's Robespierre
  is
  a force of Nurture – chalk-white
  moon-face strangled by high collars and a thin-lipped voice ever prophesying doomy Utopias. Robespierre
  is
  the passion of repression and auto-pilot idealism,
  even
  more terrifying, like a penned hurricane, than Danton's
  freely detonated fury. Even Robespierre is
  given his slice of the human tragedy by Wajda.
  In
  the last scene, after Danton's guillotining he lies
  a-drench with sweat under a bedsheet while his young son,
  prompted by his mother, proudly recites by heart the rubrics of the
  revolutionary constitution. But for a moment it looks as if Robespierre, eyes
  popping with silent pain, is succumbing to death by lethal irony. Great moviemakers are
  sometimes without honor even outside their own countries. Wajda was
  clearly fired to come to France to film the Danton-Robespierre
  conflict for its kinship with political polarities in present-day Poland:
  "counter-revolutionary" Lech
  Walesa versus
  the unyielding "revolutionary" rigidity of the Party. Once in
  power, Wajda argues, a revolutionary movement often
  becomes as autocratic as the tyranny it ousts. It congeals in its own dogmas;
  it is a prey to the barbarities it preached against; most alarmingly and
  irreversibly, it enthrones itself above the very laws it instituted with its first
  breaths of freedom. No doubt Danton's ambivalences are too complex for
  modern European Communists, who want a message that spreads straight from the
  Moscow freezer. And Wajda hasn't even made the stylistic
  concession to them of shooting the film like an agitprop
  documentary
  – in that hand-held, smallpox-grained, shake-em-up
  style that's always considered the imprimatur of revolutionary cinema. Wajda says
  that he took the neo-classical paintings of David as his model for both
  color (rich blues and grays) and lighting (from stylized shafts like Roman
  columns to the theatric flicker of candles). And the clash between formalist
  surface and seething, impassioned interior gives the film the very
  energy-through-conflict that is absent in most caméra militant movies, where style and Message redundantly
  and often concussingly duplicate each other. Furthermore, Wajda's movie is about the struggle between
  formalism and freedom: the body democratic wrestles with the corset autocratic.
  When the screen does suddenly explode in a coup d'oeil
  – a giddying track-forward into the towering, black-draped guillotine,
  the hectic pan-shots that follow Depardieu-Danton
  up and down court as he argues his defense – the dramatic dividends
  are far higher for the surrounding restraint. There is one scene
  whose fiercely funny idiomatic humanity radiates out and helps to heat the
  whole movie. Danton, not yet arrested but
  suspecting he soon will be, invites Robespierre
  to
  his house and sets out a lavish banquet to soften him up. But Robespierre remains
  unmoved as dish after dish is wafted solicitously under his nose – foie gras, quails, duck – and
  gestured impassively away. Finally the host, realizing that that game
  is up, sits down and sweeps each dish coolly and purposefully onto the floor
  before beginning his next stratagem: talk. "We are the last
  chance for freedom," says Danton. And Wajda's movie persuades us of the terrifying fragility
  of freedom. For doubters, come to the Berlin Wall and see the Soviet
  guillotines. COURTESY T.P. MOVIE NEWS. THIS ARTICLE APPEARED
  IN THE JUNE 1983  ISSUE OF FILM
  COMMENT. ©HARLAN
  KENNEDY. All rights reserved.  | 
  
      |